Well, the trunk is the 2.x branch.

It's a bit unfortunate because we've gotten a bit behind with the 1.3 release and now we are in a situation where we pratically have 2 versions ready for release (1.3 & 2.0). I still think there are some issues with 2.0 that need resolving over the next couple weeks, but I think we should probably try and cut off the 2.0 feature development where things stand now and focus on finishing up the release by finishing up any unresolved issues and fixing bugs. I would also be comfortable with actually finalizing the 2.0 release in the next week or two and tagging it, but not releasing it publicly for another week or two after that.

Also remember that we decided to only do database changes on upgrades between major versions, which means that Roller 3.0 will be the next opportunity to do database related changes. So tagging will have to target a Roller 3.0 release.

Anything that doesn't require database changes can be scheduled for Roller 2.1 or later. So the "intranet" mode would be a good one for Roller 2.1.

I suppose it would be good to have a simple discussion about what our roadmap is. Stuff that I have on my list are ...

Roller 2.x
- custom authentication w/SSO support (acegi)
- presentation caching upgrades (likely with memcached support)
- standardize weblog templates (Weblog, _day, _css, _decorator)
- more spam prevention measures (comments & trackbacks)
- more flexible url structure
- auditing
- instrumentation
- theme improvements (rewrite?)

Roller 3.x
- tagging support
- more complete dashboard

obviously we may not accomplish all the 2.x items before going to 3.x, but i listed them there anyways.

-- Allen


Elias Torres wrote:

I guess we need a 2.1/2.x branch because of tagging, "intranet" mode, etc.  :-)

Elias

On 10/21/05, Dave Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
/roller/trunk now contains the Roller 2.0 code-base (next release: 2.0)

/roller/branches/roller_1.x now contains the Roller 1.X maintenance
branch (next release: 1.3)

- Dave



On Oct 21, 2005, at 5:08 PM, Dave Johnson wrote:

I'll post an ALL CLEAR when I'm done - Dave

Reply via email to