+1 and +1.
Henri Yandell wrote:
+1, both to Allen's email and Matt's 120 chars.
On 11/3/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm +1 for following the standard conventions. However, I'd like to
propose we use 120 characters per line instead of 80.
http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/html/CodeConventions.doc3.html#313
Matt
On 11/3/05, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i hate to bring this up yet again, but i want to make sure this is truly finalized.
i think most of us are in favor of K&R style code supported by the standard
java coding conventions, so let's put it to a final vote.
does everyone agree that we will move forward supporting the standard for Java
programming code conventions detailed here?
http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/html/CodeConvTOC.doc.html
assuming we are all in agreement, then can we also agree that all new files will be
introduced using the new conventions. when you go to modify an exisiting file you should
first reformat the entire file and update it to the new code conventions, then commit
that version back to svn with a comment like "updating file to new code
conventions". then go ahead and make your edits.
i am +1 on the Java programming code conventions.
-- Allen
