On 11/5/05, Dave Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 4, 2005, at 7:21 PM, Allen Gilliland wrote: > > Anyways, I wanted to try and feel out how many people really like/use > > those "edit" links which show up on their weblog when they are logged > > in. I have never used them so I wouldn't care much if they were gone. > > I really like the edit links on the page and the especially the > editor-menu which appears when I'm logged in. I'd hate to lose that > feature and I don't think it's hard to have a special cache for > logged-in user pages (since we do that now) or just leave them out of > the cache.
I agree with Dave here - I rely on the "Edit" link quite heavily. If we do take it out, please provide a configuration setting to add it back in. Matt > > I don' think logged-in-user-pages filling up the cache is that big of > an issue at all. They only get cache if the user browses his own blog, > generally users don't do that very often and when then do they don't > generally visit every page. So, they don't double the cache as you > suggest. > > I do think there are things we can do to limit the number of pages that > we render for each blog. For example, we render a unique page view for > every day (via the the /page/user/YYYYMMDD URLs) and for every entry > (when viewed by permalink). If we could find a better way to structure > our views of past posts, we could save lots of memory and bandwidth. > > - Dave > >
