I'm fine with 1.2.11, that's what I'm currently using.
On 11/10/05, Anil Gangolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK. 1.2.11 anyone? > > --a. > > Matt Raible wrote: > > >http://www.cheblogs.com/roller/page/damien?anchor=jboss_and_log4j_1_2 > > > >On 11/10/05, Anil Gangolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>I've just built and done some testing of Roller 2.0 in my own workspace > >>with log4j 1.2.12. All I had to do was drop in the jar and change the > >>properties.xmlf to point to it. The existing default Roller > >>log4j.propertiers configuration seemed to work without any issue. > >> > >>Is it ok to check this in, or is it too risky for 2.0 at this point? > >> > >>Matt, can you remember the specific problems you had with configuration > >>compatibility? > >> > >>--a. > >> > >> > >> > >>Matt Raible wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>I recently tried to upgrade to 1.2.12 and found that there were some > >>>incompatibilities with my config file. I forget what they were - but > >>>it basically wasn't a simple upgrade. For that reason, I'm currently > >>>using 1.2.11. > >>> > >>>Matt > >>> > >>>On 11/6/05, Anil Gangolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Log4j is up to 1.2.12. We're still using/distributing 1.2.4 in the > >>>>trunk (bound for 2.0). I think we should upgrade to 1.2.12 in the trunk. > >>>> > >>>>May want to look at some of our other dependencies as well before 2.0 > >>>>goes out. > >>>> > >>>>--a. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
