The sames goes for DB2/Derby, I'll do another round of testing and input my versions on the matrix.
Elias On 11/27/05, Dave Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good idea. Users should know the limitations. For example, we now have > an Oracle database creation script. But since none of the developers > did any testing with Oracle, so we can't really vouch for Oracle > support. That's a pretty important piece of information. > > - Dave > > > > On Nov 27, 2005, at 3:36 PM, Anil Gangolli wrote: > > > > > I'd like to resuscitate the idea that we publish the list/matrix of > > developer-tested platform combinations for each release ( container, > > jdbc driver, db server, jdk version, os version ). > > > > Not trying to discourage exploration, but I think users should know > > if they are pioneering uncharted waters or on relatively safe ground > > when installing on a particular platform combination. > > > > Any reservations on me adding a wiki page for 2.0 on this topic? I > > envision a table with a row for each platform component and a column > > for each tested configuration,with a bottom row specifying the > > developers who "vouch" for that combination. > > > > I thought there was some objection the last time I proposed this, but > > I can no longer remember the reasoning, and I'm even more convinced > > now that this is worthwhile. > > > > --a. > > > > > >
