+1. I need that postgres fix :) Tried to take my dev install from 1.3 to 2.0 last night, but errors.
I can try to find time to test it, but as I'm on a plane tonight to San Diego it might be tricky to find net time :) Hen On 12/9/05, Elias Torres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1, but we also might have a few fixes, since we are just converting > our patches to work with Roller 2.0 released and are finding some bugs > we could use in a roller 2.0.2 release. > > Thanks, > > Elias > > On 12/9/05, Anil Gangolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > +0 > > > > No objection. Unfortunately, I am not properly set up to test on > > PostgreSQL at this time. Otherwise I would. > > > > > > Matt Raible wrote: > > > > >+1 for release. Unfortunately, I won't have time to test it. > > > > > >Matt > > > > > >On 12/8/05, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > >>that sounds good to me. since we are doing this we should probably also > > >>include a fix for the error reported when using oracle. > > >> > > >>-- Allen > > >> > > >> > > >>Dave Johnson wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>I just uploaded Roller 2.0.1 RC1 to my personal space on > > >>>people.apache.org. > > >>> > > >>>*** Why do we need to release 2.0.1? > > >>> > > >>>The database upgrade scripts and start-up code did not work properly > > >>>for those upgrading from PostgreSQL. > > >>> > > >>>*** What is Roller 2.0.1? > > >>> > > >>>A bug fix release of Roller 2.0 for those upgrading PostgreSQL based > > >>>Roller systems. > > >>>Upgrading PostgreSQL users should download this release instead of > > >>>Roller 2.0. > > >>> > > >>>The release was built from roller/branches/roller_2.0 rev 355352 > > >>>Changes were made to the 130-to-200 migration script and the > > >>>UpgradeDatabase class which was using syntax incompatible with > > >>>PostgreSQL. > > >>> > > >>>I've tested the upgrade scripts and code with MySQL and PostgreSQL and > > >>>I've given a copy of the build to the fellow who reported the problem > > >>>so that he can verify the fix. > > >>> > > >>>Additional testing would be very nice. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>- Dave > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
