The patch that I previously submitted contained the following:
1) Added #showRSDLink() macro to WEB-INF/classes/website.vm
2) Added new file WEB-INF/classes/flavors/rsd.vm
3) Modifications to theme templates:
M themes/brushedmetal/Weblog.vm
M themes/basic/_decorator.vm
M themes/clean/Weblog.vm
M themes/robot/Weblog.vm
M themes/grey2/Weblog.vm
M themes/x2/Weblog.vm
M themes/currency/Weblog.vm
M themes/berkley/Weblog.vm
M themes/pacifica/Weblog.vm
M themes/moonshine/Weblog.vm
M themes/cheb/Weblog.vm
M themes/werner/Weblog.vm
M themes/sunsets/Weblog.vm
M themes/rolling/_header.vm
M themes/movablemanila/Weblog.vm
M themes/currency-i18n/Weblog.vm
M themes/sotto/Weblog.vm
I can resubmit the patch with the #showRSDLink() macro updated for the
new RSD URL. Should I remove rsd.vm from the patch? Also I generated
the patch with "svn diff" on the 2.0 branch, is that the right/best way
to do it?
-- Sean
Allen Gilliland wrote:
Should I resubmit my patch with website.vm referencing the new RSD url?
Should I also move rsd.vm to another location? Should I add this
servlet to the patch? What about web.xml? Is it generated by xdoclet?
yes, we will need to use the new RSD url. i will handle the rest as far as
adding the RSDServlet and rsd.vm.
-- Allen
