+1
On 1/3/06, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > that's fine with me. > > -- Allen > > > David M Johnson wrote: > > > > I was hoping we'd be able to release Roller 2.1 during December. We put > > it in production on a couple of sites (that will remain nameless ;-), > > but there are still a couple of open issues that are holding up the > > release. Here's the summary page for the 2.1 release: > > > > http://rollerweblogger.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp? > > page=Proposal_Roller_2.1_Release > > > > Now, Allen and I are getting started with "2.2" features and fixes for > > a deployment end of January release. Here's the 2.2 summary page: > > > > http://rollerweblogger.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp? page=Proposal_Roller_2.2_Release > > > > Since 2.1 is not quite done, maybe we should take the stuff we had > > planned for 2.2 and put it in 2.1. Here are my arguments: 1) People are > > still coming to grips with 2.0 and don't necessarily need/want a new > > release right now, 2) we'll save time by not going through the release > > cycle right now and 3) most of the 2.2 changes are bug fixes and > > performance improvements -- stuff that ought to be fixed. > > > > What do you think? > > > > - Dave > > > > >
