David, I really would like to avoid branching. If so, is my only option to wait until code-freeze to add tagging code to trunk?
-Elias On 1/5/06, David M Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The proposal looks pretty simple and straight-forward to me. I assume > that you have chosen the "Leave categories alone and simply add > tagging support" option, is that true? > > Is there enough information in this proposal for us to OK committing > this to SVN? > > Should 1) we wait until 2.1 is done, 2) create a branch for it now or > 3) try to get it in 2.1? > > From my point-of-view, option #1 is the low-pressure and easy way to > go. > > BTW, our proposed code-freeze for 2.1 is Thursday Jan. 19th. > > - Dave > > > > On Jan 4, 2006, at 4:40 PM, Elias Torres wrote: > > > I've updated Allen's proposal for WeblogTags with some details as per > > our IBM internal implementation. I would love it if several of you > > gave it another look and commented on how we should proceed with it. > > We have plenty of code to turn this around really quickly, but would > > need your approval first. Once you give it a go, just tell me which > > branch to start editing and I'll get to work. I'm still on vacation, > > so this would be the best time for me to do this before I get back on > > the crazy schedule of work/school life. > > > > http://rollerweblogger.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=Proposal_WeblogTags > > > > Regards, > > > > Elias > >
