On Jan 28, 2006, at 11:22 AM, Andy Jefferson (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
1. "atrocious performance problems".
Not really quite sure what you're referring to there. You can
always consult the independent benchmark PolePosition (available in
the JPOX docs) that clearly shows JPOX **outperforming** Hibernate
on virtually all tests. JPOX completes the test suite in a *sixth*
of the time that Hibernate needs. I'm sorry if that's considered
atrocious to you. Just wait til we get the time to really optimise
its performance.
2. "JDO is dead". Heard it all before. There are many people
wanting JDO since it gives things that "Java Persistence 1.0"
doesnt. Datastore agnostic. Provides more complete O/R mapping.
3. Yes, JPOX does have "Java Persistence 1.0" on the roadmap. That
means what it says it means. The plan is to provide that interface
for people who want to use it. JDO2 is a superset of Java
Persistence 1.0 after all.
4. You've never been seen or heard from on the JPOX forum so
perhaps if you have issues about a piece of software you could
actually consult the people who support its use rather than coming
out with this rather uneducated viewpoint in a blog that the
developers of that software are hardly likely to see unless they
just happen to come across it in a web trawl.
Thanks Andy.
In all fairness, Jeff did not post his message in a blog. He posted
his concerns here on the Roller dev list and then Matt Raible and I
blogged about it. So blame us hit-seeking bloggers for stirring
things up.
I've heard other people express the similar questions/concerns about
JDO (but not specifically JPOX) and so I'm glad to hear that you are
aware of them and have good answers for them.
- Dave
