-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm ok with it.
- -Elias Dave Johnson wrote: > I'd like to create two new branches: > > *** Release branch for 2.1 > > Now that we're on a 2nd release candidate for Roller 2.1, I'd like to > move 2.1 to a branch for final fixes and then to a tag when we release. > We have lots of small fixes and improvements on tap for the next > release and we need to get to work in the trunk. > > *** Development branch for tagging > > Our users are *very* eager to get their hands on tagging, but I think > we need to walk carefully here. Instead of committing the tagging code > to the main branch, I'd like have it committed to a development branch > for review. I'm suggesting this because 1) we're pretty stable now and > getting comfortable with the new caching system 2) there seems to be a > some controversy about tagging related performance/ caching concerns and > 3) tagging is a significant change that needs more than usual review. I > guess we could do it in the sandbox, like I did for the initial Planet > Roller work, but a branch seems easier and cleaner. > > Everybody OK with this? > > - Dave > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD3p17tsNTCOFcV0oRAu+uAKCFMiN5z+Po5KyUVHe0MxoySH+VkgCfQPrH k9x5Q+JSBwyocaChbls9URo= =D/MQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
