IMO, a security package should always be on the latest release. Should I check out from:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/roller/branches/roller_2.1/ To make this change? Matt On 2/10/06, David M Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm +0 on that Matt, unless there's a change it will break something. > > If you want to do it and do a little testing, I'll re-spin the build. > > - Dave > > > On Feb 10, 2006, at 1:59 PM, Matt Raible wrote: > > > Should we upgrade to Acegi 1.0 RC2 before the release? > > > > http://forum.springframework.org/showthread.php?t=22167 > > > > On 2/10/06, David M Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> On Feb 10, 2006, at 1:35 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > >>> My usual release process worked happily this time. > >>> Are there release notes listing the new features/fixes? > >> > >> Yes, the CHANGES.txt file lists the issues and the what's new page on > >> the wiki provides a more user-friendly write-up with screenshots. > >> > >> http://rollerweblogger.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=Roller_2.1_WhatsNew > >> > >> Time for a final release vote? > >> > >> - Dave > >> > >> > >>> > >>> Hen > >>> > >>> On 2/9/06, David M Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Roller 2.1-incubating RC3 is available. The only change since > >>>> RC2 is > >>>> a fix for the PostgreSQL issue that Henri identified (see below). I > >>>> did some testing with PostgreSQL and check the 2.0.1 to 2.1 upgrade > >>>> path. > >>>> > >>>> Release files are here: > >>>> http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/release_candidates/ > >>>> > >>>> Documentation drafts are here: > >>>> http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/doc_drafts/ > >> > >> > >
