Nope. I haven't had a chance. Perhaps a hosted demo is in order? Or a screencast?
On 3/2/06, David M Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anybody had a chance to evaluate Elias' tagging work? > It's been a month now since Elias submitted the work. > > - Dave > > > > On Feb 9, 2006, at 12:50 PM, Allen Gilliland wrote: > > Unfortunately, no, I haven't had time. > > > > I've been pulled off of all my normal blogs/Roller duties to handle > > an unrelated urgent issue. Hopefully I'll have time to look at it > > next week. > > > > AFAIK Roller 2.1 still hasn't been released, so I don't think this > > is at risk for 2.2 yet. > > > > -- Allen > > > > > > On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 06:17, Elias Torres wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> Allen, > >> > >> Have you had a chance to look at the tagging code? I want to know > >> what > >> the next steps are. We should have more discussion on the subject > >> if we > >> want to do this with 2.2. > >> > >> - -Elias > >> > >> Allen Gilliland wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 09:58, David M Johnson wrote: > >>> > >>>> On first glance, I don't see any reason this shouldn't go into > >>>> trunk. > >>>> Are we happy with the data model? > >>> > >>> > >>> whoa, whoa, whoa! I haven't had a chance to look at this yet, > >>> but please don't rush this into the trunk. I'm not sure if your > >>> comment was really meant to suggest that you felt it was ready > >>> for the trunk, but I just want to be clear. > >>> > >>> -- Allen > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> - Dave > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) > >> > >> iD8DBQFD6075tsNTCOFcV0oRAvGbAJ9nWj7QXiNlCR+OLFw5gQylFczQjwCfbY/S > >> yBpXEaT9MFm9GnHRAN5v19s= > >> =9jrZ > >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
