Dave Johnson wrote:
On 8/17/06, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (1) Why the sandbox pseudo-branch when we have SVN to handle branches
> properly?
agreed. a branch is better than the sandbox IMO.
Either way is fine with me. By using the sandbox you can exist inside
an existing branch, which has some advantages. By using a separate
branch, you can avoid the custom build and separate src dir noise.
actually, you are probably right about using the sandbox instead of a
branch because this work really shouldn't go directly in the src
directory. so it wouldn't be of any benefit to work in a branch.
i would suggest using the 3.0 branch in that case, and then when that
branch gets merged back to the trunk we would continue from there.
-- Allen
> (2) Is the proper base the trunk or the Roller 3.0 codebase?
3.0 should probably become the trunk very soon, we definitely don't want
to base any further changes off of anything other than 3.0.
Yes. You definitely want to work in the 3.0 codebase.
- Dave
