On 10/20/06, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry about the long delay in finally responding to this...

Now that major licensing issues are apparently behind us,
let's wrap this up...

+1. Probably best if I focus time on this rather than on the 3.0 release etc.

On 8/22/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looking at our status file, the following need to be checked off:
> *1* Check and make sure that the files that have been donated have
> been updated to reflect the new ASF copyright.
> *2* Check and make sure that for all code included with the
> distribution that is not under the Apache license has the right to
> combine with Apache-licensed code and redistribute.
> *3* Check and make sure that all source code distributed by the
> project is covered by one or more of the following approved licenses:
> Apache, BSD, Artistic, MIT/X, MIT/W3C, MPL 1.1, or something with
> essentially the same terms.
> *4* Migrate Jira
> *5* Migrate wiki
> *6* Setup incubator.apache.org/roller/

Thanks for the summary.

It doesn't look like much as changed:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/roller.html


> 2 and 3 should be good, so I need to double-check distributed jars and
> then sign off on those. Mostly I want to check if we're distributing
> BCL licensed jars.

Any progress on #2 and #3?

Looking at my 2.3.1 release, the ones that jump out are:

concurrent, antlr - public domain
mail, activation - bcl

I'm not concerned with the public domain - that's more an issue of
finding out how we deal with public domain and there are lots of uses
of antlr and concurrent out there; but the bcl ones can't be in our
distro. I think those are the BCL ones, rather than the newer
Glassfish ones. Are we still shipping them?

Also, in jdobackend:

./sandbox/jdobackend/lib/toplink-essentials.jar

strikes up a flag. Any idea to the license on that? I suspect we need
to make sure we don't distribute that.

> On 1, I seem to recall there being a few files that were copyrighted
> to other people. Cliff's documented a policy on this now and we'll
> need to change things (all the ASF does). Not all files need the ASF
> copyright, so if we have some left without that we can figure that
> out.

And #1?

We have copyright to:

Thomas Fuchs
Erik Bosrup
Sun Microsystems
David M Johnson (including in the outputed javadoc by the look of it)
BSquare
OpenSymphony
Geir Landr
Marty Haught
(and in xinhua)
 interactivetools.com
 dynarch.com
 Walter Zorn
The PHP Group
 DTLink, LLC

None mentioned in the NOTICE.txt. A large number of them are from
javascript bits, but there are a lot in the source too.

My understanding is that we need to mention all of these in the
NOTICE.txt - but I'm also a bit worried by just how many of them are
there.

> 4 is a technical problem with JIRA. We can ask infra if they would
> prefer the JIRA moved from there to issues.apache.org, or keeping it
> there for the moment.

So we can post-pone this until after graduation?

+1.

> 5 is a small sticking point. There're no JSPWiki installs at the ASF,
> just MoinMoin and Confluence. Looking at the Roller wiki, the content
> looks more like a website anyway and I think a fair amount of it
> should be flattened into #6.

I propose that we:

- Move the website portion of the wiki (i.e. the front page of helpful
links) to static HTML files at incubator.apache.org/roller/.

- Pick a wiki to be used at Apache org

- Establish a Roller page on the wiki

- Do all new Ideas and proposals at the Apache Roller wiki

- Put a "This is the old wiki, go to the new one" links on the
rollerweblogger.org/wiki site

- Gradually migrate content from the old wiki, now and after graduation

+1

> Lastly, 6, we need to have a web presence at Apache.

I think that's covered by the above.

Yep. people.apache.org died, but no reason not to start on the static
website part of things. Then we can request a wiki to be created
(different machine from people, but largely the same admins I suspect
- who are quite busy atm), and then migrate stuff.

Hen

Reply via email to