Thanks for the info, but i still cant see the difference from the old one and the one from olc.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dwight Campbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Michael Gerner Andreasen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:33 AM Subject: Re: Olc 2.01 and socials problems > On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Michael Gerner Andreasen wrote: > > >I already knows how to sort the socials it aint the problem. > > > >look in the new socials file in the data directory > >and compare the number of socials with the number there is in > >socials.are in the area directory it is not converting alot of em so olc > >kinda droped em the first many socials are there, but the last 50 or so > >is not, and thay are in the same order as thay where in socials.are so i > >dont see the problem, anyone else seen this problem with olc2.01? looked > >at the archive and dident see much related to this. > > > >any help would be nice. > > having difficulty remembering the (code) details offhand, but *think* the > bug is in load_socials() in db2.c ... check references to social_count and > maxSocial. took me a bit to track down that problem when I ran into it a > while back... actual issue is that counter for number of socials loaded > during first (conversion) boot isn't getting incremented in the right > place. > > | dwight a campbell - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://rats.darktech.org - KD7KJG | > | yet another linux guru in training & reality avoidance therapist at large | > | tired of voting for the lesser evil? vote kthulhu & yog-sothoth in 2004! | > | We need some golf shoes,otherwise we'll never get out of this place alive | > > > -- > ROM mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.rom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rom >
