Right, but that's the point. You were asking if they could demand removal of their area, and with a statement like that, it ensures that they cannot, as your tools were used to create the area.
We had a builder come to us once asking for the removal of their area, and we did indeed refused based on this contract. Once they were requoted it, they removed their request. I don't honestly think anyone would go to a court over a dispute over a free game (atleast i'd hope they wouldn't).... *shrug* I'm a firm believer in the idea that as long as your not taking away their work from them (IE: "You may not use this area anywhere else"), there is nothing wrong with requesting that you be allowed to keep something that you had when they built it. -----Original Message----- From: Dale Kingston [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11/19/2002 at 5:05 PM To: "Jamie Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[email protected]> Subject: Re: OT: Ownership for work done for a mud. Message: >Well we have a simular agreement, that is emailed to them when they are >'hired'. But alot of the discustion I saw said that, those agreements are >void with out the acctul signature and or verifiyable digital signature of >the authour. Now from what I've read both the author of the said work, and >the mud owner of the work. Both have the rights to use it. The builder >cause >he created it and the mud owner cause the builder use his tools to express >his creativity. I was just wondering if anyone out their has delt with this >before, and maybe got a real conclution. >
