So setting it in the command each time would work. Gotcha. Another thing to add to my interp_cmd table, but thats cool. Then righht before the interpret() I can set it there.
Thanks, Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Gauthier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Chris "Winston" Litchfield'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 11:12 PM Subject: RE: Spamming > set d->repeat = 0 for commands you don't mind them spamming. (I think in > the command itself) > > Or you could add an additional bool to the interp table, and if TRUE, then > it resets the spam counter. (then you don't have to edit all the functions > individually) > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris "Winston" Litchfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 11:03 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Spamming > > > > > > ROM has spam checking in that it checks for a string repeated > > X amount of time. This is fine as it can catch some people > > spamming the mud. However, this does not work for things > > like "note, note, note ,note" or "n,n,n,n,n,n" spamming. > > > > So in order for me to prevent that I have long since added > > (&& !strcmp(...,"note"); statements here. > > > > Does anyone have a better system to avoid performance issues? > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > -- > > ROM mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.rom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rom > > > > -- > ROM mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.rom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rom > >
