On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Richard Lindsey wrote:
> yeah that's the approach i've already decided to take, as with it being
> 3 tables, it's the lowest table count i could come up with when
> brainstorming a few different ways of doing it... thanks for confirming
> it tho :)
Interestingly enough, contrary to popular belief, the goal with DB design
(normalisation), more tables is better than less tables - if you do proper
data normalisation.
- d.
--
Dominic J. Eidson
"Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!" - Gimli
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.the-infinite.org/
