Re: Natural behavior of integers

[mrpotatohead]

>bleh

I'm too lazy to read all of that, but the wrapping is correct. The reason
why it does this can be seen if you think of an integer in binary.  If the
max it can hold is 32767 (all 1s), then adding 1 to that value in binary
would require setting the next most significant bit to 1 and all previous
bits to 0.  However, there is no next most significant bit, so the 1 falls
off, leaving us with the rest, which is just 0.