If you notice down below I hand patched it because if I tried to patch
over OLC 2.1 I'd get a ton of .rej files. May-be I should try patching and
hand patch the rest in. Hmmm may-be. OLC 2.1 handles files a bit
differently. IE.. tablesave function. etc. ahh well.
Dantin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stainless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "ROM Mailing List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: Rom24b6 / OLC 2.1 / Lopes 2.0
>
> When you patch it, it should give you .rej files. View those file and see
> the things that didnt get installed when you patched it.
>
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Stainless wrote:
>
> > I got done hand patching Lopes Colour 2.0 into my mud and I get a bunch
of
> > problems. Heres what I did. I took the fresh source and compiled it with
OLC
> > 2.1 with some minor code changes. Just key words. Then I patched in
Lopes
> > 2.0 and I get stuff like this when it compiles:
> >
> > structure has no member named "blah" <- example.
> >
> > I know OLC has changed a bunch of stuff with the savetable.
> >
> > I was wondering if someone on the list has been able to code in
Lopes
> > along with OLC 2.1. If so could you tell me what you had to change in
order
> > for it to work? I put do_colour and do_color in the command.h file. Is
there
> > something I'm missing? Thanks for all your help in advance.
> >
> > Dantin
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ROM mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.rom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rom
> >
>
>
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
>
> ("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._
> `6_ 6 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`)
> (_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-..-'
> _..`--'_..-_/ /--'_..' ,'
> (il),-'' (li),' ((!.-'
>
