Reaping the European Union harvest

Jan 6th 2005 | RIGA 
>From The Economist print edition


How the new central European members learnt to stop worrying and love
the European Union

AFTER grumbling furiously about dangers to their sovereignty and their
social values when they joined the European Union in May, Poles are
discovering themselves now to be among the Union's most loyal
citizens. Some three-quarters say they are happy with EU
membershipâand no wonder. In its first eight months of membership
Poland got some â2.5 billion ($3.4 billion) from the EU budget, or
roughly twice what it paid in, according to the newspaper
Rzeczpospolita. Rural incomes have risen by one-third for small
farmers and two-thirds for big ones, reversing eight years of
stagnation and decline, thanks to munificent EU subsidies and an
influx of foreign buyers offering high prices for Polish meat and
fruit.

Poland's total exports rose by more than 30% in the first nine months
of 2004, helped by the abolition of customs formalities. EU rules have
opened the skies to budget airlines, boosting tourist numbers by 20%
last year. Higher-than-expected tax revenues have meant
lower-than-expected budget deficits, not only in Poland but also in
the Czech Republic and Hungaryâalthough the EU says that Hungary is
still doing too little to balance its books.

The Polish economy was particularly strong in 2004, because it was
recovering from a recession exacerbated by bad government policies.
But almost everywhere in central Europe, the first eight months of EU
membership have been good for business. In Poland, the Czech Republic,
Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia, growth averaged 4.6% in 2004, up from
3.5% in 2003, according to the Economist Intelligence Unit, a sister
company of The Economist (see chart). The three Baltic countries,
Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, with their less regulated economies,
grew even faster, at 6.7% in 2004, though this was still slower than
in 2003.

For all of the new EU member countries, the key to growth has been
their labour costs, which are far below those of their main export
markets in the 15 existing members, especially Germany. Export growth
declined during the year, but economies in the "new Europe" still did
almost embarrassingly better than those in the old. The euro-area
economies grew by 1.8% year-on-year in the third quarter of 2004, but
the worst-performing economy in central Europeâthe Czech
Republic'sâgrew almost twice as fast.

Nor is it economic gains alone that have made the new members of the
EU feel happier. Poland's president, Aleksander Kwasniewski, and his
Lithuanian counterpart, Valdas Adamkus, wielded far more clout as
leaders of full EU member countries when they waded into the chaos of
Ukraine's disputed presidential election between October and December,
urging the government to overturn a first rigged result in favour of a
pro-Russian candidate, Victor Yanukovich, and to allow the re-run that
was won by a pro-western candidate, Victor Yushchenko. After the
Ukraine showdown, the central Europeans may also find it easier to
push the EU's foreign policy in two directions which have long
preoccupied them. They want to raise the possibility of future EU
membership for Ukraine, Moldova andâif it can somehow ditch its
dictator, Alexander Lukashenkaâeven for Belarus. And they want to see
the EU treat Russia with maximum caution.

Now that they have tasted the EU's attractions, central Europeans are
much less likely than once seemed possible to revolt against the draft
EU constitution. Their earlier worry, that the EU was moving the
goalposts before they had even got on to the playing-field, is
dissipating. Lithuania and Hungary have already ratified the
constitution, becoming the first EU countries to do so, by
parliamentary votes. Poland still has a referendum pencilled in for
this autumn, or even next year, but a yes vote looks increasingly
likely.

The trickiest case may be that of the Czech Republic, where the two
main opposition parties, the Civic Democrats and the Communists, both
have strong Eurosceptic factions. Vaclav Havel, the Czech Republic's
first post-communist president, argued this week for ratifying the
constitution by parliamentary vote, on the grounds that the public had
already made an open-ended commitment in 2003 when they voted to join.
But the Czech prime minister, Stanislav Gross, is said to prefer a
referendum at the same time as the general election, which is due to
take place in June 2006, although his fragile coalition government may
fall sooner.

All that said, the increasing EU-friendliness of the new members does
not necessarily mean that their relations with the more defensive
older members, such as France and Germany, will improve greatly.
Indeed, they may get worse, especially if the new members go further
in cutting their taxes to stimulate growth. France and Germany were
already complaining loudly last year that excessively low taxes in
central Europe were sucking investment and jobs out of western Europe.
They, and Belgium, have questioned why the EU should give regional
assistance to countries that seemingly choose to collect very little
in taxes.

That last argument will now be easier to puncture. Slovakia set the
regional benchmark last year with a 19% flat rate for income tax,
corporate tax and VAT. But it has turned out to be a good way of
raising money, as well as a brilliant advertisement for Slovakia's
business climate. The government had braced itself for a fall in
overall tax revenues in 2004, but it reported happily this week that
that they had in fact shown a modest rise.

An outcome like this can only encourage Civic Platform, a conservative
party that looks likely to win power after Poland's elections this
year and has been toying with proposing a 15% flat rate for the same
three main taxes. The Czech Republic's ruling socialists are also
looking for ways to cut payroll taxes and so reduce labour costs. Old
Europe is being forced to respond: Austria, which borders Slovakia,
has cut its corporate-tax rate to 25% in 2005 from 34% in 2004.

The competition can only get tougher. Romania, which is due to join
the EU in 2007, has just introduced a 16% flat rate for income and
corporate taxes, and its labour costs are far lower even than
Slovakia's or Poland's. Looming further down the road is Turkey, which
could carpet all Europe with low-paid workers from Anatolia. For all
the countries of Europe, in short, enlargement is proving to be less a
sudden shock than a long and salutary squeeze that should help to
force them to become more competitive.





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Give underprivileged students the materials they need to learn. 
Bring education to life by funding a specific classroom project.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/FHLuJD/_WnJAA/cUmLAA/RR.olB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

EuroAtlantic Club: http://www.europe.org.ro/euroatlantic_club/ 

***
Birou de traduceri autorizate. Oana Gheorghiu - tel/fax: 252.8681 / [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/romania_eu_list/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Raspunde prin e-mail lui