>I happened to see a BBC report about a textile company in Romania >that was importing "temporary" workers from China because they >claimed they couldn't get Romanian workers. The socially left-wing >corporatist BBC naturally presented this as a positive development, >but I was appalled. > >This a perfect example of putting the welfare of business ahead of >the welfare of the people. If the company cannot fill the positions >at the wages they're offering, they should raise them.
Firmele italienilor din Bacau platesc pe angajatii romani la nivelul salariului minim pe economie si au pretentia ca angajatii sa traga la jug ca sclavii. Se si poarta cu ei ca si cum ar fi animale de povara, ii ameninta, tipa, injura, etc. Cum romanul e destul de docil, cind nu are alta solutie, indura. Cum s-a ivit posibilitatea plecatului in Spania si Italia, i-a lasat balta pe italieni. >If they truly cannot, then their company doesn't make economic sense. Are sens daca aduce chinezi care sint si mai docili decit romanii, accepta sa stea inchisi in tarc ca intr-un lagar si nu fac 24 de ore decit sa munceasca, nanince, doarma si iar sa munceasca. >If they go out of business, their Romanian employees will find other >jobs easily given the putative labour shortage. Romanii si-au gasit locuri de munca pe alte meleaguri. >Why shouldn't Romania import "temporary" workers? Pai nu spuse madam Albright ca Romania nu are destui imigranti de aia nu ne dadura voia sa intram in NATO cind fu intrunirea la Madrid? Era pe vremea lui Constantinescu. >Well, for one thing, history has shown that "temporary" workers are >anything but, and "labour shortages" are transient. Nu exista asa ceva ca temporary worker. Daca e pentru citeva luni max 1 an da, poate, daca e pe mai multi ani si include adusul si restului familiei atunci e permanent. Exemple de astea sint si la case mai mari, in SUA unde exista chipurile viza de "temporary non-immigrant worker" numita si H1B. >Secondly, it is a form of colonisation. Pai, indreptam corijenta aratata cu degetul de Albright, nu? >Labour shortages result in higher wages, Chinezii adusi la Bacau sint platiti, conform legii, cu salariul mediu adica de aprox 3 ori mai bine decit erau romanii si muncesc si mai multe ore fara sa cricneasca. Deci din punct de vedere cinic al banului si afacerii e convenabil pentru italieni. >Perhaps Romania could take those wages paid to the Chinese workers, >much of which will leave the country, and use them to automate instead? Daca cacanarii de italienii ii plateau pe romani cu salariul mediu atunci ar fi avut de unde lua forta de munca. In vestul Europei sau SUA macaronarii nu si-ar fi permis sa-si trateze angajatii asa cum ii trateaza pe romani sau chinezi. DIn pacate la noi protectia muncii sau alte organizatii puse sa aiba grija de angajati nu-si fac deloc datoria. >Unfortunately, Romania has come under the thumb of the EU, dominated >by a socially left-wing corporatist ideology that wants immigration, >wants colonisation of Romania and other countries, as a result of >racist, left-wing ideology that holds the native population of >Europe in contempt and a desire for cheap, compliant labour. Nu-s convins ca e musai de la EU. Poate sa vina si de la foruri mai inalte. >They will use the false pretext of "rights" to force Romania to >allow the "temporary" workers to colonise Romania permanently. Din pacate nu transpar public toate dedesubturile si cum de politicienii romani au acceptat acel nonsens. >The patriotic businesses and organisations, media, government, and >people of Romania must fight the colonisation of their country. Hm. Au sa sara acusi tovii internationlisti daca aud de patriotism.
