http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/leading_article/article1790425.ece
 
The Times 
May 15, 2007


Balkan Brawl


The future shape of Europe is at stake in Romania’s power struggle


Less than five months after Romania joined the European Union, the drive to
defeat corruption has all but ground to a halt. The success of
anti-corruption reforms was a central criterion for acceptance of Romania’s
accession bid. Yet, since January, a campaigning justice minister has been
replaced by a 30-year-old novice, two senior prosecutors investigating
alleged bribe-taking by politicians have been sacked, and a president who
came to power on an anti-corruption ticket has been relieved of his duties
on what appear to be trumped-up charges of “exceeding his constitutional
role”. He is now fighting impeachment.

Two factors offer hope for a positive end to this political paralysis: polls
and well-attended rallies in larger cities indicate that President Basescu,
a plain-spoken former sea captain, retains the trust of voters and will
defeat the effort to impeach him in a referendum on Saturday. Secondly, the
European Commission still has powerful levers with which to help Mr Basescu
to regain his reformist momentum. But if the Commission misuses the
incentives at its disposal, the outlook for one of the poorest corners of
Europe, and for the future of European enlargement, will be bleak.

The admission of Romania and Bulgaria into the EU put the European bodies
that must monitor their progress in uncharted territory. Neither Italy, nor
indeed Brussels itself, shines as a beacon of transparency, but never in the
Union’s history have there been accepted, as full members, countries so
weakened by systemic corruption, organised crime, fragile judiciaries and
“oligarchic” control of both print and broadcast media. In these respects
both countries still resemble Russia and Ukraine more closely than they do
their fellow EU members, lending some credence to the view that their
accession should have been delayed pending deeper reforms.

It set a poor precedent when Olli Rehn, the EU Enlargement Commissioner,
failed to impose on Bucharest or Sofia reform “benchmarks” as rigorous as
those that the ten new members in 2004 were required to meet. This left the
completion of too many reforms a matter of trust rather than of
self-interest. But in Romania, President Basescu has so far repaid that
trust. It was at his instigation that the country’s first independent
anticorruption commission was set up and the files of its notorious
communist-era secret police were thrown open. He has consistently resisted
succumbing to overreliance on Russian energy and investment, presiding over
strong economic growth fuelled by Western investment instead.

“We will have another Romania after the referendum,” Mr Basescu promises in
The Times today. He deserves the chance to fulfil that promise. The EU can
help, but only by adhering strictly to the postaccession reform benchmarks
it has imposed on the principle that reform is better late than never. It
should continue to refuse to recognise Romanian court decisions abroad until
the country can demonstrate the robust rule of law at home. Most
importantly, Javier Solana, Secretary-General to the Council of the EU, must
resist the urge to display largesse in his report next month on the progress
of Romanian reform. The release of £1.7 billion in aid this year, and
billions more over the next five years, depends on his verdict. It is time
for tough love towards Bucharest.

© Copyright Times Newspapers Ltd

----------------------------
 
Vali
"Noble blood is an accident of fortune; noble actions are the chief mark of
greatness." (Carlo Goldoni)

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know
peace." (Jimi Hendrix)

Raspunde prin e-mail lui