IG, some of the others in my group are expressing concerns at the incomplete implementation of IMAP in citadel (not just IMAP4rev1 vs IMAPx, but the way IMAP features are not supported or are broken across multiple clients) which is causing them to lack faith in using Citadel for our crucial communications platform. I have tried to reassure them that things are happening to fix things, but it is hard to keep saying that when there is no communication for a while. We switched to citadel because of the ability to have a totally closed system for our own communications, rather than a "public" email server which would have to be filtered heavily.
I know you are busy, and this is not your primary work, and I hope this does not come across as a lack of appreciation for what you have done. We are primarily dealing with people who have no clue about a BBS system compared to a fill in the blank, and just need some way to communicate securely. I would appreciate hearing your thoughts on the matter, and your honest appraisal of where things are at. I know some of our issues relate to the way LDAP support is implemented in citadel, (not just with the webcit, but actually citserver itself) but some of the issues are potential show stoppers. Thank you.
