I fully agree...
I figured it would be an easy fix. I almost put together a patch for it, but
I did not have time.
> Tue Apr 18 2017 09:35:31 AM EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored
>Subject: Re: LDAP and users
>
> I'm going to have to review the RFC on that one. It looks pretty easy to
>fix. Citadel does use 1 as a fixed UIDVALIDITY value, since the message
>numbers in our store are both persistent and strictly-ascending, so we can
>use them as UIDs without resorting to any ugly hacks.
>
>(Actually, the whole concept of a UIDVALIDITY value is, on its own, an ugly
>hack. It's just one of many pieces of brain damage baked into the IMAP
>protocol merely because of flaws in the reference implementation.)
>
>
>
>
