No, it's nothing to do with the latest commit. I probably fell behind in that conversation .. what I'm saying is..
Based on my testing of various popular Russian/International RSS feeds, it is possible there can be any kind of junk in not only the Subject Line, but also Author/Creator fields. I've seen, at minimum, plenty of html showing up in the From: header through room messages created by rss. It is not always complete, usually with the opening tag, and some additional text (probably up to the closing tag.) I don't have it up here in front of me, but there is the section that if one is empty, the other is populated. That may have dredged up things we never knew existed. The other comment was likely cryptic as well. I was offering the opinion that It makes no difference to me if Author/Creator is filled out. It could and maybe should be hard-coded as simply "rss" since it's technically not a deliverable address anyway, and it's unlikely someone would reply directly to it as though to contact the author, without looking at the content, or visiting the link first. No big deal, just my .02.. But, one small request of mine is, while you're in there .. can you add a log line so we can see why some feeds silently fail? I had started working on that, but was not that familiar with how to bubble it up from expat. If not, I'll get to it eventually. Thanks, and sorry for any misunderstanding. :) > Thu Nov 19 2020 11:01:12 PM EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored >Subject: Re: Subject lines > > >>There is all kinds of junk in those subject lines.. even CDATA. Also > >Are you making this observation from an audit and/or test of the latest >commit, or from what is on Uncensored? I'm not *running* the fixed code yet >because there is another part of the build that is broken. When I finish the >new inbox rule parser I'll publish it all at once. > > > >
