lol
far enough to forget about it :-P
thanks for the replies anyway :)

On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Alex Ionescu <[email protected]> wrote:

> Just to make the point clear: It will overflow on January 1st, 584942.
>
> Best regards,
> Alex Ionescu
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Alex Ionescu <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Windows NT time is specified as the number of 100 nanosecond intervals
> > since January 1, 1601
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Alex Ionescu
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 8:13 PM, King InuYasha <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> Then what DOES NT use to calculate time?
> >> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Alex Ionescu <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Again, since Ged wasn't clear: This is NT. NT does not use Unix time.
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Alex Ionescu
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Sylvain Petreolle <
> [email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > I also noticed a funny thing browsing the year 2038 website :
> >>> > http://www.2038bug.com/demo.html shows the first negative date given
> by
> >>> > a
> >>> > negative int32 number.
> >>> >
> >>> > -2147483648, Fri Dec 13 20:45:52 1901
> >>> >
> >>> > Kind regards,
> >>> > Sylvain Petreolle
> >>> >
> >>> > ________________________________
> >>> > De : Ged <[email protected]>
> >>> > À : ReactOS Development List <[email protected]>
> >>> > Envoyé le : Dimanche, 12 Avril 2009, 1h19mn 26s
> >>> > Objet : Re: [ros-dev] Year 2038 problem
> >>> >
> >>> > This is NT, not unix (thankfully)
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]]
> >>> > On
> >>> > Behalf Of Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo
> >>> > Sent: 12 April 2009 00:02
> >>> > To: ReactOS Development List
> >>> > Subject: [ros-dev] Year 2038 problem
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Hi all,
> >>> > i hope you have already taken into account this:
> >>> >
> >>> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem
> >>> >
> >>> > Regards,
> >>> > Javier
> >>> >
> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >>> > Ros-dev mailing list
> >>> > [email protected]
> >>> > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Ros-dev mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Ros-dev mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

Reply via email to