Aleksey Bragin wrote: > Also, as in discussion in bug #4169 I see total lack of > understanding. Johannes fixes how he thinks it's right, Dmitry fixes > another place thinking he is right, Stefan blames everyone thinking > he is right. > > What anyone of you have done to ensure correct behaviour? Was testing > of the kernel exported routine has been done? And then testing > advapi's code above the "correct" implementation? Even if the current > kernel's implementation is bad, it's not a reason to hack it further. > > Also asking in the ros-dev ML helps if any of you have no idea what > they are fixing. There are still some knowledgable people here.
This regression, which is known for 4 months and about which people complained on the forum, I thought it was enough reason to return to a hack when nobody is working on it. _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
