Steven Edwards wrote:
> if (((int) Res || !Res) == -1)

Ehhhm, you probably mean something like 'if ((int)Res == -1 || !Res)', don't
you? The one you've written makes no sense for me.
Maybe that could even be replaced with a simple 'if ((int)Res < 0)', haven't
looked at the whole code yet.

Best regards,

Colin

_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

Reply via email to