You can create physical apartuses (aparatii?) that demonstrate the existence of pseudo-forces, so they do "exist". The term "pseudo" doesn't mean "non-existent".
Hell, go up a building and drop a heavy object in a perfect straight line. It'll land a bit east because of circular motion forces that are "pseudo". On 15-Jul-09, at 5:22 PM, Alex wrote: > Hello Timo, > > Thursday, July 16, 2009, 4:09:30 AM, you wrote: > >> [01:12] care2debug: Physicus: do you have a physics degree? I >> wonder >> how one can make such blunders who is not in the 7th grade :) > > Oops, that didn't sound very well, I agree, even if it was not meant > as a serious remark (see the smile). Heat of the discussion, I > suppose. > > For that I apologize. > > But I still don't think banning was an appropriate solution. You could > ignore me, you could tell me to STFU, anything. > >> The ban was to make you think about your behaviour. Please learn the >> stuff (there is a centrifugal force, it is only existant in the >> rotating >> reference system and not in an inertial system and it's a pseudo- >> force, >> but that doesn't make it non-existant, learn about what a force is at >> all) and learn to be less of a smartass. Your ban has already been >> removed > > I see that you agree that this is a pseudo-force. But since this list > is not related to physics I will not continue this discussion here. > > -- > Best regards, > Alex mailto:[email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev Best regards, Alex Ionescu _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
