So you are saying that you are hacking correct code, to fix a bug in a hack, cause it's easier?
Dmitry Gorbachev wrote: >> That function is not supposed to be called by old bootloader directly. >> > > It is called indirectly through KiRosPrepareForSystemStartup function, > after it applies a hack (ke/freeldr.c:1272). This new hack is to fix > that old hack. (Ugh!) > > >> Why is that needed? >> > > Otherwise, the double fault and nmi descriptors become mutilated. When > these interrupts happen, it causes a (virtual or real) machine to > crash / reboot. Better to be able to examine situation from kdbg. > > >> And why in this function? >> > > Simpler to do it here. > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
