LOL, I love that "I couldn't find any documentation on MSDN and in some arbitrary collection of headers, so it must not exist".
I also never talked about MS provided documentation. 3rd party documentation still qualifies as documentation and it's better than nothing, if not even better than a lot of MS documentation. Here, for you to read: http://www.geoffchappell.com/viewer.htm?doc=studies/windows/km/hal/api/x86bios/index.htm&tx=7 Maybe it helps you to understand that x86Bios functions have absolutely nothing to do with EFI. Done. Timo Alex Ionescu wrote: > http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=safari&rls=en&q=%22x86BiosCall%22+site%3Amicrosoft.com&aq=f&oq=&aqi= > > Your search - "x86BiosCall" site:microsoft.com - did not match any documents. > > bash-3.2$ grep -ir 'x86BiosCall' /ntdev/headers/ --include *.h --include *.c > bash-3.2$ > > Your turn. > > On 2009-12-30, at 12:23 PM, Timo Kreuzer wrote: > > >> Prove it. >> >> Alex Ionescu wrote: >> >>> The services are undocumented and reserved for EFI. >>> >>> They are not "Documented" and there's no reason to use the Vista >>> implementation. >>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ros-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >> > > Best regards, > Alex Ionescu > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
