>yes, I asked LoneRifle to remove the reference because I was  preparing much 
>better information (which has just been released  yesterday) and 
>didn't want people to read old incomplete info. So  from now on you could use 
>this information in our wikipedia article.

If that was the case, that makes sense.  Removing the information from the 
article outright, as opposed to simply waiting and updating the article 
with more detailed information when it was available might have been a better 
way of doing things so no red flags pop up, in my mind 
or the mind of others.  Alternately, you, LoneRifle, or whoever is the one most 
in charge of maintaining the Wikipedia page should have at least 
noted that the information was going to be replaced with updated information so 
no other Wikipedia editors were left to assume that the information
was simply going to disappear.  Probably the only reason I didn't revert the 
changes immediately was because I wanted to ask the devs about it 
first to see if there was a misunderstanding.  My desire to see ReactOS succeed 
was tempering my natural instinct to assume the worst about the
situation.

Betov already made accusations of ReactOS fans tampering with Wikipedia a while 
back, and while I don't believe that his claims are true, a 
random person reading Betov's accusations and then seeing that kind of a 
statement in the article's revision history might be more apt to be 
apprehensive about the project.  Because of the bad rap ReactOS has gotten in 
the past, we have to be more careful to avoid feeding into any 
misinformation that has been spread about ReactOS.  Hopefully you can see why I 
was concerned.  It's cool now, we'll just have to do things a bit 
differently in the future.

Thanks for getting back to me so quickly.

Since that's cleared up, now I can sit around and get excited about Arwinss 
again.  When should us testers expect to see a working Arwinss in the
 trunk builds to test?  

-Joshua Bailey



      
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

Reply via email to