The world can be a funny place to live in. On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Olaf Siejka <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes... We publish our details on ARWINSS, it obviously cannot be trusted. > We tip off any broader online media about it, they publish THE SAME THING > (obviously it cannot even be validated, as most journalists out there, the > matter is too complicated for own, independent revaluation, not to mention > the time expense) - its a trusty source. > > Makes perfect sense. > > 2010/1/17 Alwyn Tan <[email protected]> > >> I've been advised by Wikipedia that mailing lists are a bad source of >> information, though like you, I too have my doubts. I think the main problem >> stems from the fact that the sources are self-published and hence not as >> reliable, as say, 3rd parties who have a need to maintain journalistic >> integrity, and hence can be trusted as a more reliable source of >> information. I think the idea is that say, journalists, have an obligation >> to perform due diligence on the content they publish, either through >> personal interviews with us or otherwise, and so therefore are more >> trustworthy than even we are at reporting our own things. >> >> Perhaps it might be best to just play by Wikipedia's rules for the time >> being. >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Aleksey Bragin <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Alwyn - are you really sure? The information has been published in a >>> mailing list (this one) by me, so this is the best ever reference. I don't >>> really get why should some 3rd party be involved, if wikipedia article could >>> have a direct reference to the matter? >>> >>> Nevertheless, I'd like to spread the news via osnews.com of course. >>> >>> On Jan 17, 2010, at 6:10 PM, Alwyn Tan wrote: >>> >>> Hello, I'm reverting your edits, as the reviewers have deemed the sources >>> of information unacceptable for the article to achieve Good Article status. >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Olaf Siejka <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for your work and interest. >>>> >>>> 2010/1/17 Joshua Bailey <[email protected]> >>>> >>>>> I read the PDF and other information earlier today. I've just >>>>> updated the Wikipedia page (in English, at least) >>>>> regarding Arwinss with the newer, more detailed information. >>>>> Hopefully, once more people know about Arwinss >>>>> and what it will do for ReactOS, more people will appreciate the >>>>> potential of this project and join in. >>>>> >>>>> I felt you guys should know, since I brought up the issue earlier. Feel >>>>> free to check on it and correct any errors >>>>> I've made. :) >>>>> >>>>> -Joshua Bailey >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Ros-dev mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Ros-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ros-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ros-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ros-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
