Besides,,, the leak was in before that so,,,,,, look at bug 4980. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Aleksey Bragin <[email protected]> wrote: > 1. Since when ros-amd64-bringup boots to the desktop and works like a charm? > It's a major achievement. > 2. ros-amd64-bringup tree is merged till r45185, while you made 12 commits > to win32k after this, 4 to user32 and 3 to gdi32 (saying "adding > experimental code for regions"). > > > WBR, > Aleksey. > > On Feb 5, 2010, at 10:59 AM, James Tabor wrote: > >> Since this is true and the ros-amd64-bringup tree is up to date with >> the region and WND code I committed without the assumed fixes to the >> region leaks in my working tree,,,,,,,,,,, Also to note I was looking >> for a ghost,,,,, wasting my TIME!,,,, >> >> Is it possible to build ros-amd64-bringup in 32 bit mode? >> >> So,,,,, I can continue my work and commit my updates to head knowing >> I'm not the FFFf ff uf problem! >> >> FYFI: I just finished a point to point compare and the only >> differences are kernel changes! >> Thanks, >> James > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
