To be fair: 1. The guy donated his code to ReactOS. Think of it like a gift to us - it might not be what we really wanted, but it's still rude to insult a gift.
2. This isn't "support" for PCMCIA, it's a stub - he said so himself. ReactOS does not support PCMCIA yet. 3. Windows supported PCMCIA before USB, and we are just copying Windows after all! :) On 15 April 2010 10:11, Andrew Faulds <[email protected]> wrote: > You mean we're supporting an interface no-one needs before the biggest gap > in ReactOS I/O support? > > 2010/4/15 Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo <[email protected]> >> >> ReactOS has PCMCIA support before USB >> lol :) >> >> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Aleksey Bragin <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> I fully agree with Ged. I know it's fun to create something from scratch >>> (I used and will still do, of course) and work in an explored area, however >>> I think there should be some control. If you really want to work on that and >>> nothing else - we have rosapps/drivers. In my opinion, trunk has no place >>> for non-working drivers which aren't really a top priority (at least, I >>> didn't include fastfat_new to the build process so noone wastes time >>> compiling a driver which is needed only by 2 or 3 developers). >>> >>> WBR, >>> Aleksey. >>> >>> On Apr 15, 2010, at 11:05 AM, Ged Murphy wrote: >>> >>>> I don't mean to sound like a broken record, and I also understand that >>>> the project allows people to work on whatever they want to. But with the >>>> project in such a state at the moment, is a pcmcia bus driver really the >>>> best thing to be working on? >>>> I'm all for project freedom, but you would hope people to have the >>>> diligence to work on areas which might help to stop the project from >>>> failing. >>>> >>>> Maybe I just don't get it anymore and I'm behind the times, but what >>>> happened to the days when people used to work on important things? >>>> >>>> >>>> Your nagging ex-dev, >>>> Ged. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: [email protected] >>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] >>>> Sent: 15 April 2010 02:59 >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: [ros-diffs] [cgutman] 46876: [PCMCIA] - Add a mostly stubbed >>>> PCMCIA driver - pcmcia.c is complete but fdo.c and pdo.c are completely >>>> unimplemented >>>> >>>> Author: cgutman >>>> Date: Thu Apr 15 03:59:15 2010 >>>> New Revision: 46876 >>>> >>>> URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=46876&view=rev >>>> Log: >>>> [PCMCIA] >>>> - Add a mostly stubbed PCMCIA driver >>>> - pcmcia.c is complete but fdo.c and pdo.c are completely unimplemented >>>> >>>> Added: >>>> trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/ >>>> trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/fdo.c (with props) >>>> trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pcmcia.c (with props) >>>> trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pcmcia.h (with props) >>>> trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pcmcia.rbuild (with props) >>>> trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pcmcia.rc (with props) >>>> trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pdo.c (with props) >>>> Modified: >>>> trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/directory.rbuild >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Ros-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ros-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ros-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > > > > -- > Andrew Faulds (andrewros) > http://ajf.me/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
