The logical layout is exactly what is wrong with the tree. The tree is currently laid out in a manner which you would expect someone who doesn't understand NT architecture. Things are laid out by type instead of by architecture. It makes building individual areas of the operating system very difficult.
On 25 July 2010 19:03, Aleksey Bragin <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, there is no sense in doing two mainly unrelated very big tasks > simulteneously. Also my own opinion still hasn't changed - existing layout > is quite logical (there are exceptions, but they are everywhere), and any > modularization could be achieved already with existing tools like sysgen. > > Let cmake branch be actual cmake experiment, not an awesome attempt to fix > whole ReactOS at once [image: Улыбка смайлик] > > WBR, > Aleksey Bragin. > > > *From:* Zachary Gorden <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Sunday, July 25, 2010 9:45 PM > *To:* ReactOS Development List <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [akhaldi] 48236: Create a branch > forcmake bringup. > > I also support a reshuffling of the directories, but not in the cmake > branch. Let that be used JUST for getting cmake up and running and if/once > that is merged into trunk, then we look into changing the structure. Best > not to complicate one task by adding more to it. > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >
<<Emoticon1.gif>>
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
