This is why i prefer alternative approach: http://www.reactos.org/wiki/Bug_Filters http://www.reactos.org/wiki/Buglist
Regards 2010/9/17 Adam Kachwalla <[email protected]> > Thanks... > > (wow... there are a HELL of a lot of bugs... 666 to be precise!) > > > > On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 21:15:49 +1000, Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo < > [email protected]> wrote: > > here: >> >> >> http://www.reactos.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=ReactOS&long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&rep_platform=x86+Hardware&op_sys=ReactOS&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailcc2=1&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Importance&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0= >> >> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Adam Kachwalla <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> I have a question: where is the list of unresolved issues? >>> >>> On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 21:01:30 +1000, Aleksey Bragin <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> As for existing 0.3.12-milestone entries in the BugZilla, I think they >>> fully make sense because vast majority of them are regressions, and most >>> of >>> them already have one or another solution ready. >>> >>> Please allow a few more days of the trunk feature freeze, until the list >>> of >>> unresolved 0.3.12 issues is empty. I know how much annoying that is, but >>> it's for the good of the project. >>> >>> WBR, >>> Aleksey Bragin. >>> >>> On Sep 14, 2010, at 9:41 PM, Olaf Siejka wrote: >>> >>> As we progress into regression fixing, we are now in the good moment to >>> decide upon upcoming release. It would be great if we could manage with >>> the >>> 0.3.12 for the October Chemnitz event, where we are invited again to >>> participate, not to mention that its the time for such release. >>> >>> Right now, in my opinion we should decide without futher delay on the >>> following: >>> - reviewing the REGRESSION list, this is - to confirm entries with 0.3.12 >>> milestone already set, as well as doublecheck the rest, to see if any >>> should >>> be promoted to said milestone. This is the action of most utter >>> importance, >>> as there is no way to know how much time will be spent on futher >>> research, >>> testing and fixing them; >>> - decide upon bugs originated with last ole/comctl sync - are we haxing >>> them locally, risking another winesync or perhaps reverting? >>> - reviewing patches stored at http://www.reactos.org/wiki/Bug_Filters as >>> well as deciding if any should be adapted for current release. >>> >>> Those actions, first of them especially, should be performed as swift as >>> possible, else we might risk considerable delay and nervous finish before >>> the Chemnitz. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. >>> Teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime. >>> Give a man religion and he will die praying for a fish. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ros-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >>> >>> > > -- > Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. > Teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime. > Give a man religion and he will die praying for a fish. > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
