Colin Finck wrote: > Change NT5 to NT5.2 and the list should become quite short. > > As long as no one proposes a major change, we are still heading for > NT5.2 compatibility (at least kernel-wise). And then we have to verify > that all our API implementations are not just compatible to some NT5 > version but 100% compatible to NT5.2.
I think it's more important to test against XP from an API level as that's what most software is installed on > Encountering an NT5.2-incompatible API can be as easy as testing > screensavers (see r28953/r28955). Tell me how to avoid such mistakes in > the future if we don't consequently test against NT5.2. Whilst parts of our kernel try to target 5.2 changes, from a testing perspective it should be pretty much identical to 5.1. IMO, unless you're a kernel dev interested in implementing some of the more elegant kernel features in 5.2, then anyone with a 5.1 box is more than adequately setup and I can't think of any worthwhile advantage in having a 5.2 install. Ged. _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
