Am 07.03.2011 14:33, schrieb [email protected]:
Author: jgardou
Date: Mon Mar 7 13:33:10 2011
New Revision: 50991
...
+ Reg[3] |= 0x800;
...
+ if ((Reg[0]& 0x0FFF3FFF)< 0x00000633)
I'd prefer symbolic constants over these magic numbers.
+
+ DPRINT1("Supported CPU features :\n");
+#define print_supported(kf_value) \
+ if(FeatureBits& kf_value) DPRINT1("\t" #kf_value "\n")
+ print_supported(KF_V86_VIS);
+ print_supported(KF_RDTSC);
+ print_supported(KF_CR4);
+ print_supported(KF_CMOV);
+ print_supported(KF_GLOBAL_PAGE);
+ print_supported(KF_LARGE_PAGE);
+ print_supported(KF_MTRR);
+ print_supported(KF_CMPXCHG8B);
+ print_supported(KF_MMX);
+ print_supported(KF_WORKING_PTE);
+ print_supported(KF_PAT);
+ print_supported(KF_FXSR);
+ print_supported(KF_FAST_SYSCALL);
+ print_supported(KF_XMMI);
+ print_supported(KF_3DNOW);
+ print_supported(KF_AMDK6MTRR);
+ print_supported(KF_XMMI64);
+ print_supported(KF_DTS);
+ print_supported(KF_NX_BIT);
+ print_supported(KF_NX_DISABLED);
+ print_supported(KF_NX_ENABLED);
+#undef print_supported
Can we make this more compact please? Like "Supported CPU features:
V86_VIS, RDTSC ..."
Thanks,
Timo
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
