AFAIK 6.x has a MAJOR difference in structure. Swapping target before even arriving at our original destination sounds like an invitation to a mess beyond description to me.
IMHO we may consider moving on to 6.x, *after* arriving at a stable, workable, and useful 5.x. For ex, many of my old colleagues *refuse* to use anything newer than XP SP2, because of all the compatibility issues, and they do *not* want that headache in addition to dealing with their own application code. WBR // Love On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Adam <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it is NT 5.2 though. I cannot work out why not set the target for > 6.x though as that kernel is more stable than the 5.x version. > > > On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 21:29:58 +1000, Love Nystrom <[email protected]> > wrote: > > 2011/4/5 Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo <[email protected]> >> >> AFAIK we are targetting 2003 kernel >>> >>> >> But 2003 is still a 5.x kernel, isn't it ? >> Or am I starting to suffer brain coagulation from recurrent heat stroke ? >> >> I'm using 4th Ed as my compass .. and 5th edition address 6.x kernel. >> If we're really working on a 6.x kernel now, I need to know where >> we transcended >> from 5.x so I can archive a private branch of 5.x at it's last known >> version. >> >> WBR // Love >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Love Nystrom <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi James, >>>> >>>> Yes, most interesting, but isn't it a little beside point? >>>> I mean, we're still targeting the XP kernel in ReactOS, aren't we? >>>> Or have I missed a re-targeting point in my absence? >>>> >>>> >>>> > > -- > Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ >
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
