Are you serious? Have you ever used WiX in a serious capacity? It's far superior to NSIS in pretty much every way.
On 2 June 2011 22:18, Adam <[email protected]> wrote: > I do not like the idea of moving to Windows Installer for RosBE 2.0 - it can > be quite tedious to clean up if the install is half done. IMO the original > installer (NSIS) is much more cleaner than Windows Installer too. > > If it ain't broke don't fix it I say. > > On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 06:52:17 +1000, Colin Finck <[email protected]> wrote: > >> [email protected] wrote: >> > if not exist "CMakeLists.txt" ( >> >> Can we decide on dropping support for rbuild stuff in RosBE 2.0? >> Reasons: >> >> - RosBE 2.0 will certainly come with an updated set of build tools. >> (GCC 4.6 with mingw-w64 target is planned, maybe even a multilib >> version) >> The target change already makes older builds uncompilable with RosBE >> 2.0. Even if this would be fixed, nobody would guarantee you that a >> revision built with RosBE 2.0 behaves the same as one compiled with >> 1.5.x. >> - Several versions of RosBE can be installed parallely, especially if >> you're also moving to a Windows Installer for RosBE 2.0, which doesn't >> care about Uninstall entries of NSIS. So everybody has the option >> to build older rbuild-powered revisions at any time. >> - It could make all scripts cleaner again :-) >> >> Regards, >> >> Colin >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ros-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > > > -- > Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
