Maybe you could add all the other changes with checkin comments such as "this should be sent upstream to wine" to that plan too :)
That practice has become quite common these days. Ged. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Jérôme Gardou Sent: 09 August 2011 22:32 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [jgardou] 53152: [RPCRT4] - restore lost ros specific change. Thanks Vic. Don't worry, it's part of the plan! Le 09/08/2011 23:29, Ged Murphy a écrit : > Call me nuts, but why don't you add a ros_diff patch so it doesn't get > lost again??? > From: [email protected] > Sent: 09 August 2011 18:43 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [ros-diffs] [jgardou] 53152: [RPCRT4] - restore lost ros > specific change. Thanks Vic. > Author: jgardou > Date: Tue Aug 9 17:43:37 2011 > New Revision: 53152 > > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=53152&view=rev > Log: > [RPCRT4] > - restore lost ros specific change. > Thanks Vic. > > Modified: > trunk/reactos/dll/win32/rpcrt4/ndr_marshall.c > > Modified: trunk/reactos/dll/win32/rpcrt4/ndr_marshall.c > URL: > http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/dll/win32/rpcrt4/ndr_marshall.c?rev=53152&r1=53151&r2=53152&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- trunk/reactos/dll/win32/rpcrt4/ndr_marshall.c [iso-8859-1] (original) > +++ trunk/reactos/dll/win32/rpcrt4/ndr_marshall.c [iso-8859-1] Tue Aug > 9 17:43:37 2011 > @@ -6159,6 +6159,7 @@ > case RPC_FC_WCHAR: > case RPC_FC_SHORT: > case RPC_FC_USHORT: > + case RPC_FC_ENUM16: > { > USHORT d; > align_pointer(&pStubMsg->Buffer, sizeof(USHORT)); > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
