I will this time.
As for public/private, I suppose majority wanted to have it private?
I don't have a strong position here because first of all we are not
going to discuss something, which is not for public ear, and second
is that meeting minutes are published anyway in our mailing list. If
meetings are strictly private (which is also just fine), then we need
to re-think the meeting process somehow so that meeting minutes would
be adjusted accordingly.
WBR,
Aleksey Bragin.
On Aug 25, 2011, at 1:32 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Who will be leading the meeting?
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:23 +0200, "Johannnes Anderwald"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Am 24.08.2011 11:30, schrieb Aleksey Bragin:
Hi,
this is a reminder about the Status meeting, which is to happen
tomorrow, 25th of August at 19:00 UTC. Please don't miss it.
Proposed agenda for the meeting:
1. Arwinss adoption voting.
2. CMake adoption voting.
3. Release preparation status report, deciding on the next
release date.
4. Driver signing. Discussing possible threats and deciding on an
official position wrt driver signing in future.
4. Party related to GSoC results.
I propose to move individual devs status reports to ros-dev mailing
list, because there is no reason to just sit in the irc channel and
listen to them for hours.
List of participants:
- Giannis Adamopoulos (smiley1_)
- Johannes Anderwald (janderwald)
--
With best regards
Caemyr
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
