When complete the installation of the driver placa GF8200A shipeset 8200 Through the message that the dll not found Wow32.dll
2011/8/26, [email protected] <[email protected]>: > Send Ros-dev mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Ros-dev digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Debug Buildslave Maintenance ([email protected]) > 2. Re: Debug Buildslave Maintenance (Eric Kohl) > 3. Re: [ros-diffs] [fireball] 53446: [NTDLL/LDR] - Fix wrong > loop condition which would often lead to heap underread. - Fix > wrong subkey string length calculation, which would result in an > incorrect string being used... (Ged Murphy) > 4. Re: [ros-diffs] [fireball] 53446: [NTDLL/LDR] - Fix wrong > loop condition which would often lead to heap underread. - Fix > wrong subkey string length calculation, which would result in an > incorrect string being used... (Aleksey Bragin) > 5. Re: Debug Buildslave Maintenance (Aleksey Bragin) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:29:55 +0200 > From: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Debug Buildslave Maintenance > To: "ReactOS Development List" <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > @Eric > > http://reactos.org/testman/compare.php?ids=7429,7579 > http://reactos.org/testman/detail.php?id=2639952 > > Please find that the crash is not CMake related, and CMake build is not > inherently broken. > > On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:03 +0200, "Pierre Schweitzer" > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> finally. >> Colin and I are pleased to announce you that ReactOS Linux KVM tests are >> back online and working. You can find the first tests results (on r53383) >> sent tonight by the testbot on testman: http://www.reactos.org/testman/. >> >> Regards, >> Pierre. >> >> ReactOS Development List <[email protected]> wrote on Sat, August 20th, >> 2011, 4:24 PM: >> > Timo Kreuzer <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > What about fixing release buildbot first? >> > >> > It's still a private machine owned and administered solely by Christoph. >> > >> > As long as I can't even reach him by phone, we can only wait. >> > >> > >> > > And is there a chance, maybe in the future, to switch buildbots more >> > > easily, to have a backup solution running? >> > >> > First of all, we hope that we can get the same reliability as our other >> > servers after reinstalling the server OS, giving more ReactOS admins >> > access to the machine and adding monitoring. >> > The current OS was meant to be reinstalled for quite a long time, but up >> > >> > to now, nobody with physical access to the machine had any time to do >> > it. >> > >> > If such problems continue to exist afterwards, we can try to set up a >> > fallback system, but this would require an equally configured and >> > powerful Linux machine first. >> > >> > >> > > One week without debug builds is a serious thing. >> > >> > I hope you're aware that builds are still properly uploaded, it's only >> > the testing step which fails. >> > >> > >> > - Colin >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Ros-dev mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ros-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >> > With best regards > Caemyr > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 01:01:40 +0200 > From: Eric Kohl <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Debug Buildslave Maintenance > To: ReactOS Development List <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Hi Olaf, > > I am already investigating the services test issues. One of my first > findings is that the current widl seems to mess up value ranges in some > cases. This is the cause of the following errors: > err:(dll/win32/rpcrt4/ndr_marshall.c:6496) value exceeded bounds: 918, > low: 0, high: 514 > > <rant> > It is pretty annoying that jgardou updated rpcrt4, widl and other > components without proper testing. At least he should have posted a bug > list BEFORE he comitted the new stuff. > </rant> > > Regards > Eric > >> @Eric >> >> http://reactos.org/testman/compare.php?ids=7429,7579 >> http://reactos.org/testman/detail.php?id=2639952 >> >> Please find that the crash is not CMake related, and CMake build is not >> inherently broken. >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:05:21 +0100 > From: "Ged Murphy" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [fireball] 53446: [NTDLL/LDR] - Fix > wrong loop condition which would often lead to heap underread. - > Fix > wrong subkey string length calculation, which would result in an > incorrect string being used... > To: <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > [email protected] wrote: > >> - Use Zw* functions instead of Nt* where necessary in >> LdrQueryImageFileKeyOption(). > > 'where necessary'm I don't understand this change. > People prefer (and Microsoft recommend) that Nt* is used in usermode. > Nt and Zw APIs point to the same address in usermode, so why is it > necessary? > > Ged. > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:13:26 +0400 > From: Aleksey Bragin <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [fireball] 53446: [NTDLL/LDR] - Fix > wrong loop condition which would often lead to heap underread. - > Fix > wrong subkey string length calculation, which would result in an > incorrect string being used... > To: ReactOS Development List <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed > > > On Aug 26, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Ged Murphy wrote: > >> [email protected] wrote: >> >>> - Use Zw* functions instead of Nt* where necessary in >>> LdrQueryImageFileKeyOption(). >> >> 'where necessary'm I don't understand this change. >> People prefer (and Microsoft recommend) that Nt* is used in usermode. >> Nt and Zw APIs point to the same address in usermode, so why is it >> necessary? > > This was a test for attention, and so far I got a few notices in IRC > and one in ros-dev. Good! > > Seriously, the change slipped through because I was editing source > code of both RTL (which works both at umode and kmode) and NTDLL/LDR > (which is only umode) a while ago. Of course, Nt is "preferable" in > usermode because there is just no reason to use Zw there. > > > WBR, > Aleksey Bragin. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:15:24 +0400 > From: Aleksey Bragin <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Debug Buildslave Maintenance > To: ReactOS Development List <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed > > > On Aug 26, 2011, at 3:01 AM, Eric Kohl wrote: > >> <rant> >> It is pretty annoying that jgardou updated rpcrt4, widl and other >> components without proper testing. At least he should have posted a >> bug list BEFORE he comitted the new stuff. >> </rant> > I also ranted about that. In fact that's why I stopped syncing rpcrt4 > some time ago - because new version always gave problems. So I wanted > to solve problems first and only then commit. > > But, OK, as Olaf said - if something needs to be done, let's simply > do that and fix everything which broke ;). > > WBR, > Aleksey. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > > End of Ros-dev Digest, Vol 84, Issue 22 > *************************************** > _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
