Hmmm...I'll have to take your word on that. I'll refrain from any more attacks on MSDN unless I have concrete evidence.
Kind regards, Claudiu On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Alex Ionescu <[email protected]> wrote: > Just because the checks aren't in THIS api doesn't mean MSDN lies. > > Best regards, > Alex Ionescu > > > On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 11:55 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Author: cmihail >> Date: Sat Sep 3 10:55:51 2011 >> New Revision: 53541 >> >> URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=53541&view=rev >> Log: >> [shell32.dll] >> - Don't do some parameter checks, even if MSDN says they're incompatible. >> Winetests with windows 2003 server as reference tells us msdn lies. (Spotted >> by Victor Martinez) >> >> Modified: >> branches/shell32_new-bringup/dll/win32/shell32/shell32_main.cpp >> >> Modified: branches/shell32_new-bringup/dll/win32/shell32/shell32_main.cpp >> URL: >> http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/branches/shell32_new-bringup/dll/win32/shell32/shell32_main.cpp?rev=53541&r1=53540&r2=53541&view=diff >> >> ============================================================================== >> --- branches/shell32_new-bringup/dll/win32/shell32/shell32_main.cpp >> [iso-8859-1] (original) >> +++ branches/shell32_new-bringup/dll/win32/shell32/shell32_main.cpp >> [iso-8859-1] Sat Sep 3 10:55:51 2011 >> @@ -330,9 +330,6 @@ >> (flags & SHGFI_PIDL)? "pidl" : debugstr_w(path), >> dwFileAttributes, >> psfi, psfi->dwAttributes, sizeofpsfi, flags); >> >> - if ( (flags & SHGFI_USEFILEATTRIBUTES) && >> - (flags & (SHGFI_ATTRIBUTES|SHGFI_EXETYPE|SHGFI_PIDL))) >> - return FALSE; >> if (!path) >> return FALSE; >> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
