(And FYI, the level of change that it would take to support WDDM drivers
would be so massive that it completely overshadows the argument of targeting
a fixed kernel version or not).

I have yet to see standard WDM video card drivers work in the first place (I
mean ATI or NVidia).

Best regards,
Alex Ionescu


On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Alex Ionescu <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have yet to see video cards that only have WDDM drivers.
>
> Best regards,
> Alex Ionescu
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:50 AM, dmex <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> WDDM drivers require Vista+****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>> *On Behalf Of *Alex Ionescu
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 4 October 2011 2:15 AM
>> *To:* ReactOS Development List
>> *Subject:* Re: [ros-dev] ReactOS August and September Meeting Minutes****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> I have yet to see drivers/hardware that requires Vista+.****
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Alex Ionescu
>>
>> ****
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Bernd Blaauw <[email protected]> wrote:****
>>
>> Op 3-10-2011 19:01, Zachary Gorden schreef:****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> kernel target.  With these considerations, the project has decided to
>> set both the user and kernel targets to Windows 2003.  Dependency on
>> Wine for many user mode libraries actually complicates this, as Wine has
>> been adding Vista and later APIs without proper segregation and the
>> developers will need to figure out how to deal with this in the long run.
>> ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Limiting things to 2003 might work, with the exception of DirectX,
>> hardware drivers and silly stuff like UEFI and GPT
>> [ http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/hardware/gg463525.aspx ].
>>
>> In other words you'll get in trouble as people want to test ReactOS
>> against their own (modern) hardware system (due to drivers focusing on
>> Vista/7/8), and see if ReactOS can run their games.
>>
>> Nonetheless, good thing you lot are able to make up your mind and sticking
>> to a argumented majority decision.
>>
>> thanks for the minutes.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

Reply via email to