Please re-read my emails before commenting them. On Monday, November 28, 2011 8:40 AM, "Alex Ionescu" <[email protected]> wrote: > Ummm... Eric wrote the e-mail a WEEK before applying them. > > *NOBODY* had any objections then. > > Also you keep avoiding the question that Aleksey and 15 other asked: HAVE > YOU TESTED THIS ACTUALLY BREAKS ANYTHING???? > > Finally, everyone needs to realize there is a chance of data loss with a > pre-alpha OS. I suspect there will be many other changes that will > require > a destructive re-format. When I was a tester for Windows Whistler betas, > every new release required a complete reformat of the disk. Windows Me > preview formatted c: when you formatted a:, and a newer beta physically > damaged the disk by sending wrong commands to the disk heads. > > If you, when testing ReactOS, or any other OS, are expecting anything > else > than a fatal destruction of your testing rig, and that every release > which > does not do so is a miracle, you're not an OS tester. > > Best regards, > Alex Ionescu > > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:44 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yes there is a problem > > > > Does anyone care for any suggestions?? Despite ROS being in > > feature-freeze, pre-release period, such change is simply commited without > > any consultation. > > > > Since when you should discuss changes AFTER applying them?? > > > > This discussion is pointless. I indeed whined too much. I should simply > > follow other testers we had previously and stop wasting my time. No wonder > > why we always had few times less testers than devs, if the primer are > > simply ignored. > > > > Let me stop being rude and disrespectful, by finishing this discussion. > > > > Next time when you be needing regression testing, please email Eric insted. > > > > Regards > > > > On Monday, November 28, 2011 12:29 PM, "Ged Murphy" < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Instead of rushing in to insult people in the way you did, why not try to > > > discuss things. > > > > > > Firstly, is there actually a problem? You might find that your partitions > > > can still be read and this was just a miscommunication. > > > If they can't, explain the problem and request that the change be > > > reverted > > > for now while the problem is further discussed. > > > > > > Do you have any suggestions on how this change could be better > > > integrated? > > > You might find that this is one of those all or nothing changes which is > > > unavoidable. It's not really a valid argument to stick with deprecated > > > technology or configurations just because it disrupts testing rigs. > > > Sometimes there's no other way than to make the leap and deal with the > > > outcome as best as possible. > > > > > > I think Eric did everything he needed to notify people that this change > > > was > > > coming. ReactOS' primary communication medium is the ros-dev mailing > > > list, > > > and despite what anyone else may think, it's definitely not the > > > #reactos-dev > > > IRC channel. He notified that the change was coming, there were no > > > objections and then the change came some days later. If only more high > > > impact changes were done like this. > > > > > > Lastly, I find it a little petty and completely untrue to say you would > > > be > > > 'kicked out the next day' or that no one values the time you spend.. You > > > know your work on reactos is just as respected and important as anyone > > > else's. > > > > > > Ged. > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > > On > > > Behalf Of [email protected] > > > Sent: 28 November 2011 11:41 > > > To: ReactOS Development List > > > Subject: Re: [ros-dev] HDD Geometry switch > > > > > > Was I and my work treated any better? I`m fed up with such selfish > > > approach > > > in this project. Had I tried to impose such serious change as this one, > > > in > > > the way it was did here, i would be kicked out the next day. > > > > > > I spent many months and money collecting hardware to test ReactOS with, > > > and > > > now i can trash all of it. Same as usual, you expect us testers to be > > > waiting on call to to the bloody dirty job, but on the other hand have no > > > problems making their work miserable. Yet you dare to bash me for lack of > > > respect?? > > > > > > You might not value my time i spend for this project, but i do. > > > > > > Good day to you all > > > > > > On Monday, November 28, 2011 10:44 AM, "Ged Murphy" > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Do you have to work at being this rude and disrespectful or does it > > just > > > > come naturally to you? > > > > This is the a great example of why the reactos forums are such a nasty > > > > place > > > > to visit. > > > > You must be quite proud. > > > > > > -- > > > With best regards > > > Caemyr > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Ros-dev mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Ros-dev mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > > > > > > > > > -- > > With best regards > > Caemyr > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ros-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
-- With best regards Caemyr _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
