Doesn't do the rest of us much good in that case. :p

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Aleksey Bragin <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is not true anymore (at least last 6 or more months). I have a local
> working copy which allows conditional building of either "trunk" or
> "arwinss" win32 subsystem DLLs and win32k.sys.
> Changes are, of course, not committed. But building arwinss ISO is as easy
> as typing "makex bootcd".
>
> WBR,
> Aleksey.
>
>
> On 01.03.2012 22:19, Zachary Gorden wrote:
>>
>> Last I heard there was no automated mechanism to build an arwinss
>> image.  Aleksey has been copying arwinss binaries by hand into a
>> vanilla ROS build before making the image.  Until someone with enough
>> motivation automates this, the rate of arwinss updates will remain at
>> the current pace.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Bernd Blaauw<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Op 1-3-2012 1:04, Sylvain Petreolle schreef:
>>>
>>>
>>>> The Arwinss builds are available on SourceForge:
>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/reactos/files/Arwinss/
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for pointing those test releases out. I guess the rate of changes
>>> and
>>> limited number of build machines might make an each-revision (just like
>>> Cmake live and bootcds) out of the question. Same for MSVC builds and the
>>> (highly?) experimental 64bit builds.
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

Reply via email to